RomneyCare - NOTHING LIKE ObamaCare!

As you can see, OBAMACARE IS NOTHING LIKE ROMNEYCARE - Only LIBERALS and "Angry" Conseratives make that FALSE CLAIM!



My open letter April 29, 2012 to Martin Fox, CEO of National Pro-Life Alliance article accusing Romney of being a Chameleon.


"Mr Fox, I have often wondered how a TOTALLY honest man could ever become President in a system like the one in America that we have allowed to flourish and even allowed the hijack of our government and turn it against the Constitution and we the people.  I have often thought that it might be an impossibility to elect a totally honest man anymore in America.


Only the Liberals who have no love of the traditional Christian nation America, and work for its destruction  can take a simple concept like "changing your mind" and deceptively re-define it as a "flip flop" to attack opponents.  What a miracle and blessing if Obama would flip flop, right?  Good thing that Norma McCorvey (Roe in "Roe vs Wade") flip flopped on abortion and has now endorsed Romney, as has National Pro-Right to Life?  Liberals like to make an "art-form" out of taking Conservative sound-bytes OUT OF CONTEXT, while along with Main Stream media, ignoring Obama's  "Marine Corpse", Australian language, 10,000 killed by Kansas twister (no, only 12), "my Muslim faith", his bowling score compared to "Special Olympics" standards, "the bomb" that fell on Pearl Harbor, ATMs cause unemployment, blamed dictator Chavez's election (1998) on Bush (elected 2000), burns over 9000 gallons of Jet Fuel on Earth day speech which could have been given from the White House, celebrates "Cinco-de-Quatro the day before Cinco-de-Mayo", FBI's "first one hundred days", visit to "57 states", expects to be President "for eight to ten years", MY GOSH WAS OBAMA EVEN BORN AROUND HERE?  


Here are some of Romney's  Conservative endorsements - some of whom you might be tempted to call "flip- floppers" like Giuliana, Huckabee, Huntsman, Perry?


Here are some of Romneys Conservative endorsements and HE IS NOT EVEN THE GOP primary winner yet.  President Ronald Reagan’s son Michael, Gov. Huckabee, Conservative radio host Michael Medved, Conservative Radio host Bill Bennett, NJ  Gov. Christie, Gov. Haley, Fox Business Cavuto, Senator McCain, Gov. Pawlenty, NY Congressman Michael Grimm, Independence Hall Tea Party PAC, Bunnie Buchanan,  President George H.W. Bush, Susan B. Anthony (Roe of Roe vs Wade), Gov. Huntsman, CEO of American Pro-Life Union Al Cardenas, astronaut Gene Cernan, former Jeb Bush spokesman Justin Sayfie, Donald Trump, Va Governor Bob McDonnell, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, AZ Gov. Jan Brewer, Rep. Eric Cantor, National Pro-Right To Life, Conservative radio host Hugh Hewett,  Gov. Jeb Bush, Evangelicals For Mitt,  Congressman Paul Ryan, Gov. Bobby Jindal, Gov. Scott Walker, Gov. Terry Branstad, Congressman Kevin McCarthy, Senator Marco Rubio, Senator McConnell, Senator Pat Toomey, Rudy Giuliani, Republican National Committee, Senator Cornyn, Gov. Perry, GOP candidate Rick Santorum, House speaker Boehner, Jerry Falwell's Liberty University.  Of course I expect LIBERALS to call these men ignorant, so how is it that you "Angry" Conservatives find YOURSELF different from LIBERALS?


How is Romney attacked by Liberal lies?  His hair looks too good, he can't sing well, his jokes are not funny, he is a flip-flopper, he loves his wife, children & grandchildren too much, 50 years ago he was a prankster, the American built cars he drives, he has legally and honorably become successful in our capitalist economy, he "cheats" on his taxes paying 35% (highest tax rate) on his earnings and an additional 15% capital gains on investments from the SAME earnings invested, and then over 15% in charitable donations for a grand total of 65%, accused of being "money hungry" when he donated ALL of his inheritance to charity, saved the Olympics and donated his ENTIRE Olympic salary to charity, and each year of his life has contributed 15%+ of his assets to charity AS HAVE I OVER THE LAST 32 YEARS - compare that to Obama, Biden, Santorum, Gingrich (all less than 2% charitable donations) AND I AM NO MILLIONAIRE - where do you see honor and honesty?  Would you even RECOGNIZE honor and honesty?


Romney's Massachusetts health care plan was passed by the 85% Mass Congress, overriding 8 Romney vetoes and still is NOTHING LIKE OBAMACARE   Step by step comparison -  NOWHERE NEAR THE SAME THING!) - Romney cast nearly 1000 vetoes as Governor of Mass - do you think LIBERAL Governors cast that many vetoes in Mass in one term?


And so now you and other, what I have describes as "angry" Conservatives, join with the LIBERALS to help promote their koolaid?  So what make you "angry" Conservatives any different than the LIBERALS?  You have taken your eyes so far off the prize that you can no longer recognize Truth, Honor, and Honesty?  Then how can we EVER elect a totally honest man in America when the "angry" Conservatives join the LIBERALS with unfounded attacks against GOP candidates?"

They claim the total tax burden in MA went up under Romney.  This falsely implies that Romney raised taxes.  In truth, Romney repeatedly proposed tax cuts, which were shot down by the Democratic MA legislature, starting as soon as he began to turn around the economy, prompting the liberal Boston Globe to complain after Romney's first year in office, "The first signs of life appear in the Massachusetts economy and the governor calls for a $225 million tax cut."  Some communities in MA chose to raise property taxes at the local level which Romney had no control over.

Some critics claim that Romney's cuts in state spending forced local communities to raise their taxes, but the fact is they were under no obligation to raise taxes.  Romney also closed loopholes in existing tax law, allowing the state to collect taxes from those who had been using schemes to reduce income reported on state tax returns.

Some critics falsely assert that Romney raised capital gains tax rates.  In truth, the tax increase was enacted before Romney was elected governor but took effect during Romney's term after having been tied up in court for several year.  Critics are unable to point to any tax increases from Romney, and Romney fought for tax cuts and did get some tax cuts enacted.

Romney's anti-FEDERAL health care position in kennedy debate in 1994

"Individual Mandate Would Force ALL Americans to Have Insurance"  Romney's bill was individual mandate because the 85% DEM state legislature over rode his veto, but only FORCED people with NO insurance to get it, because it had a true "opt out"?  Look at this summary

Do you want a POTUS who promotes the destruction of America, snorted cocaine,  enslaves our children and grandchildren to a TRILLION dollar national debt, drank to excess, hung with violent radicals, caused a TRUE unemployment of 22.3%, doesn't seem to know the difference between a LIE and the TRUTH,   OR RATHER GO WITH THE "PRANKSTER"?     NOBAMA 2012!

Definition Of "Angry" Conservatives

YES, only Obama's COOKED Job Numbers & "Angry" Conservatives Can Re-Elect him in 2012  LIBERALS alone can't do it


THE MAGIC BEHIND OBAMA'S COOKED UNEMPLOYED NUMBERS 


There are currently 12.6 MILLION Americans "OFFICIALLY" UNEMPLOYED in 2012, receiving federal unemployment checks every month.  And there are an ADDITIONAL 87.8 MILLION Americans who are working age, and not working, having already used up their FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND GIVEN UP LOOKING FOR JOBS.  These 87.8 million unemployed Americans are NOT COUNTED in the U.S. unemployment figures.  These unreported unemployed Americans SPIN the official job numbers for Obama's "BOOMING ECONOMY"!

That is ACTUALLY A TOTAL OF 100.6 MILLION working age Americans that have applied for unemployment benefits in the past and DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE JOBS.  Yes, probably several million ARE NOT LOOKING FOR A JOB because they are comfortable because of their personal situation, like living free with parents, etc.  And the rest of the HUNDRED MILLION are comfortable and not looking for a job because they make money through federal welfare and ILLEGALLY, like drug dealers and other criminal types, etc.

In 2007, prior to Obama's REIGN which began in 2008, approximately 10% of all unemployed Americans had been out of work for a year or longer.  Because of Obama's "welfare for votes" agenda, today that number has risen by 300%+ to ABOVE 30%.  That is the reason Obama is pushing for an extension to the number of years that unemployment benefits can be drawn by individuals - IT MAKES HIS UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGES LOOK MUCH BETTER THAN THEY ACTUALLY ARE, and also provide more votes from his "welfare slave" constituency.  That is also the reason for his agenda - if he can continue to raise that number during a second term, he can effectively become our first AMERICAN DICTATOR who could NEVER be voted out of office because of the rising number of welfare DEPENDENT voters, Federal WORKER voters, Union voters, crony voters, etc., etc.

But TRUE unemployment is nowhere near Obama's official figure of 8.5%.  The TRUE national unemployment figure is closer to 15% to 20%, with some of Obama's most loyal constituencies (women, Blacks, students, and Hispanics) are closer to 50%!


THAT IS WHY OBAMA MUST BE DEFEATED AT ALL COST IN 2012 - THAT MEANS THAT EVERY CONSERVATIVE AND EVERY "ANGRY" CONSERVATIVE MUST VOTE FOR THE GOP PRIMARY WINNER IN 2012, in order to GUARANTEE Obama's defeat!

LIBERALS CAN NOT RE-ELECT OBAMA IN 2012 - ONLY "ANGRY" CONSERVATIVES CAN RE-ELECT OBAMA IN 2012.

"Angry" Conservatives are Conservatives who have a FAVORITE GOP candidate but are so angry at ALL OTHER  GOP candidates that they lose sight of the ONLY GOAL of patriots who want to restore America in 2012 - and that is to vote for the GOP primary winner in 2012, which is the ONLY person with the CHANCE to unseat Obama.  Most "angry" Conservatives LOVE their GOP favorite, but actually join LIBERALS in attacking all other GOP candidates with unfounded accusations of lies and other personal attacks.  So what, if anything, makes "angry" Conservatives any different from the typical LIBERALS?


If Obama wins re-election in 2012, he will only win by ONLY 3% to 8% of the total vote.  "Angry" Conservatives, who are so blindly angry that they choose to use one of the four illogical options below in November 2012, are the ONLY ONES who can re-elect Obama if they do it in numbers amounting to 3% to 8% of the total vote.  In 2008 when very few people knew what Obama ACTUALLY meant about Hope & Change, Obama beat McCain with only 6% of the total vote.  Now that MANY MORE voters ARE AWARE OF THE TRUE Obama agenda, his re-election will require 3% to 8%, and probably closer to 3%.

WHEN an "angry" Conservative does not vote in 2012, when he WOULD HAVE VOTED for his FAVORITE GOP candidate, that's one less vote for the only person that has a chance to unseat Obama, the GOP primary winner, so places Obama UP BY ONE VOTE!


Do you know what ABO means? 

I saw a Tweet from an "angry" Conservative recently - she said "A third party vote isn't a vote for Obama ..... it's a third party vote."  She and many other "angry" Conservatives DON'T GET IT - ALL elections are won by the "RELATIVE" relationship between the number of votes for the WINNER, and the number of votes for the LOSER!  If you don't vote, that's ONE RELATIVE VOTE UP FOR THE WINNER!  So the vote you didn't cast, puts OBAMA up by one vote above the LOSER.

When an "angry" Conservative votes for a third party candidate in 2012, when he would have voted for his favorite GOP candidate, that's one less vote for the only person that has a chance to unseat Obama, the GOP primary winner, so places Obama UP BY ONE VOTE!  No third party candidate can get as much as 20% of the total vote.   Texas BILLIONAIRE (trillionaire in 2012 dollars) Ross Perot only got 18.9% of the total vote in the 1992 election, even with spending a LOT of his own money!  There is NO WAY that an American general election can be won with 20% or 30%, or 40% of the total vote!  So the vote you cast for a third party candidate, puts OBAMA up one vote above the LOSER.

When an "angry" Conservative votes for a write-in candidate in 2012, when he would have voted for his favorite GOP candidate, that's one less vote for the only person that has a chance to unseat Obama, the GOP primary winner, so places Obama UP BY ONE VOTE!  No write-in candidate in an American general election has ever gotten as many as A HALF OF ONE PERCENT (0.5%) of the total vote!  So the vote you wrote-in, puts OBAMA up one vote above the LOSER.

Sign on Highway in Northern Kenya near Sudan border

Or when an "angry" Conservative votes for ANYONE other than the GOP primary winner in 2012 unless the winner happens to be their FAVORITE, that's one less vote for the only person that has a chance to unseat Obama so places Obama UP BY ONE VOTE!


As is obvious, when "angry" Conservatives make one of the four above choices, that places Obama UP by one vote RELATIVE TO THE GOP CANDIDATE.  The only CHANCE to beat Obama in 2012 is for ALL Conservatives to vote the GOP primary winner and hold "angry" Conservative's "counter votes" or non-votes, to less than 3% of the total votes cast.

Here are two of my blog posts which provide further definition of the "Angry" Conservatives.


HERE
and
HERE http://goo.gl/P5BAh 


Liberals cannot re-elect Obama in 2012 - ONLY "angry" Conservatives can do that!

TRUE Patriots of 2012

Who are the TRUE patriots who will make a difference to RESTORE America in 2012?

Will it be the Conservative voters who voted against Obama in 2008 and will vote against him again in 2012?   This is the group that I am a member of.  This group was patriotic in 2008 and will again be patriots in 2012, but I think will not be the TRUE patriots in 2012.

Will it be the “angry” Conservatives whose favorite candidate may not be the GOP primary winner?  Who voted against Obama in 2008, but their failure to vote or failure to vote wisely could possibly re-elect Obama in 2012.  Who are so angry at all other GOP candidates that they lose sight of the ONLY GOAL of patriots who want to restore America in 2012 – and that is to vote for the GOP primary winner in 2012, which is the ONLY person with the chance to unseat Obama.  Most “angry” Conservatives LOVE their GOP favorite, but actually join LIBERALS in attacking all other GOP candidates with unfounded accusations of lies and other personal attacks.  So what makes them any different from LIBERALS?  “Angry” Conservatives will instead either:

                   1.       Not vote in 2012, or

                   2.      Vote for a third party candidate in 2012, or

                   3.      Vote a write-in candidate in 2012, or

                   4.      Vote for ANYONE other than the GOP primary winner in 2012 

unless it happens to be their favorite.

Obama will only need 3% to 7% of the total vote to win re-election in 2012.  So if the “angry” Conservatives make any of the four choices above, and at a level of 3% to 7% of the total vote, they can re-elect Obama.  The PARADOX is that “angry” Conservatives are the ONLY ONES who can re-elect Obama, but if they vote and vote wisely, they could BECOME the TRUE patriots, but they will have to totally TRANSFORM their current perceptions of the importance of defeating Obama in 2012, and realize that the GOP primary winner will be the only and possibly the LAST opportunity to do that.  But I think the “angry” Conservatives will be UNABLE to make such a transformation because of their intense anger, so will not be the TRUE patriots in 2012.

Will it be Independent and Liberal voters who voted for Obama in 2008 and will vote for him again in 2012.  I think no, not them, but I believe that these voters will NOT be able to re-elect Obama without support from the “angry” Conservatives.  There are 3 major categories in this group;

“Dependent” Voters

Welfare voters including food stamp recipients - probably a plus 10% over 2008 Obama voters.

Bottom 47% who pay ZERO federal income tax – probably a plus 3% over 2008 Obama voters.

Student loan voters – probably no change from 2008 Obama voters.

Unemployment recipient voters – probably no change from 2008 Obama voters.

“Paid” Voters

Federal employee voters – probably a plus 3% over 2008 Obama Federal voters.

Both Federal and State union member voters – probably a plus 5% over 2008 Obama Union voters.

“Constituent” Voters

Black voters – probably a minus 7% over 2008 Obama Black voters.

Hispanic voters – probably a minus 13% over 2008 Obama Hispanic voters.

Jewish voters – probably a minus 12% over 2008 Obama Jewish voters.

Student vote – probably a minus 10% over 2008 Obama student voters.

Women voters – probably a minus 9% over 2008 Obama women voters.

 "Fraudulent" Voters

Union, military absentee ballot, "community organizer" ACORN style votes, and "dead" voters - probably 6% over Obama's fraudulent 2008 votes.

Or will it be the Independent and Liberal voters who voted for Obama in 2008 and because of their disappointment and even FEAR of the effects of Obama’s INTENTIONAL agenda to destroy America, will NOT vote for Obama again in 2012.  These are the groups that made a mistake and TRULY believed the DECEPTION of Obama in 2008.  A desire to FUNDAMENTALLY transform America is only a goal of a deceiver who has NO LOVE of America.  This is the group that BEST understands this now, and is the group that I believe will be the TRUE patriots of 2012!

Why Obama's Wife-less Travel?

Is this why President Obama goes to Muslim countries Wife-less?

WHY MICHELLE CAME HOME - Interesting!
Sheppard Smith, Fox News.

"If you check President Obama's last trip over-seas, his wife left just after their visit to France .  She has yet to accompany him to any Arab country for an "OFFICIAL" visit.  Think about it.  Why is Michelle returning to the states when 'official' trips to foreign countries generally include the First Lady."

Here's one unknown source thought on the matter.

“While in a Blockbuster renting videos I came across a video called "Obama". There were two men standing next to me and we talked about President Obama.  These guys were Arabs, so I asked them why they thought Michelle Obama headed home following the President's recent visit to France instead of traveling on to Saudi Arabia and Turkey with her husband.  They told me she could not go to Saudi Arabia, Turkey or Iraq.  I said "Why not, Laura Bush went to Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Dubai."  They said that Obama is a Muslim and therefore he is not allowed to bring his wife into countries that adhere to Sharia Law for official, political visits.”

Two points of interest here:

1)  I thought it interesting that two American Arabs at Blockbuster believe that our President is a Muslim, who follows a strict Islamic creed.

2)  They also said that's the reason he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.  It was a signal to the Muslim world, acknowledging his religion.

For further consideration, here is a response from Dr. Jim Murk, a Middle Eastern Scholar and expert on Islam.  This is his explanation of what the Arab American's were saying.

"An orthodox Muslim man would never take his wife on a politically oriented trip to any nation which practices Sharia law, particularly Saudi Arabia where the Wahhabi sect is dominant.  This is true and it is why Obama left Michelle in Europe.  She will stay home when he visits Arab countries.  He knows Muslim protocol;  this includes, bowing to the Saudi King.  Obama is regarded as a Muslim in the Arab world, because he was born to a Muslim father;  he acknowledged his Muslim faith with an "accidental" slip of the tongue in an interview with George Stephanopoulus."

VIDEO 1 of 2

 In the above video, Obama speaks glowingly about Islamic accomplishments and contributions to the world over the centuries.  Compare what he said, with the TRUTH!

 "Note that he downplays his involvement with Christianity, by not publicly joining a Christian church in D.C.  And only occasionally attending the chapel for services at Camp David .  He also played down the fact that America is a Christian country and said, unbelievably, that it was one of the largest Muslim nations in the world, which is nonsense.  He has publicly taken the side of the Palestinians in the conflict with Israel and he ignored the National Day of Prayer, something no other President has ever done.  He is bad news!  He conceals his true faith to the detriment of the American people."
--- Jim Murk, Doctor of Philosophy in Middle Eastern Culture & Religion.

VIDEO 2 of 2

ACTIONS speak louder than words. Here is another interesting item regarding Sharia Law.  Why has Barack Hussein Obama insisted that the U.S. Attorney General hold the trials of the 911 Muslim Terrorists in Civilian Courts as Common Criminals instead of as Terrorists who attacked the United States of America?  If the Muslim Terrorists are tried in Military Tribunals, convicted and sentenced to death, by LAW, Barack Hussein Obama, as President of the United States, would be required to sign their death warrants.  He would not be required to sign the death warrants if they are sentenced to death by a Civilian Court.  Recently, Muslim Jihadist, Army Major Hassan slaughtered non-Muslim, soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas rather than go to Afghanistan and be a part of anything that could lead to the deaths of fellow Muslims.  He stated that Muslims “could not and should not kill fellow Muslims.”  Is the motive for Barack Hussein Obama's insistence on civilian trials, to make sure he doesn't have to sign the death warrants for the Muslim Terrorists?  Why would he, as President of the United States, not sign the death warrants for Muslim Terrorists who attacked the United States and murdered over 3,000 U. S. Citizens on 9/11?  Could it be that he is a Muslim and so is FORBIDDEN by his RELIGION to authorize the execution of Muslims?

Obama's Older brother Malik with FAMILY Picture

Think about that!  Open your eyes, ears and mind to who the President is, how he behaves and what he is doing!  Actions speak louder than teleprompter-writing.  I have said many times that Obama is not making mistakes; he is doing nothing “by accident”.  All of his actions are INTENTENTIONAL, and if you don’t understand WHY he did something, it is because you do not understand his agenda for AMERICA!

Obama's older half-brother Malik tells the Jewish people in the Jerusalem Post "Not to worry" that if his brother is elected American president he will "be a good President for the Jewish people, DESPITE HIS MUSLIM BACKGROUND".  Malik Obama is a Luo activist and a militant Muslim who argues that the black man must "liberate himself from the poisoning influences of the European culture".

Imposter in the White House?

Is There An Imposter In The White House? An Excerpt from "Hope Is Not A Strategy" -- By D.M. Lukas and John L. Mariotti

There is something very wrong when the sitting president refuses to divulge huge pieces of information about his background. What is he hiding? Maybe the “birthers” were a little extreme, but is there something wrong with this “manufactured candidate,” whose history remains sealed from public view? What is he hiding?

Could the “Hawaii birth certificate” be a forgery? Is there something much worse—like “sponsorship” by an unnamed special interest? I don’t know. I do know that the man in the White House now is an imposter. The only question is which kind of an imposter: an incompetent “pretender” or a genuine phony, a “Manchurian candidate,” who is a liberal, ½ black and ½ white, and an obvious Muslim sympathizer (despite claims of being a Christian—in clear conflict with his non-Christian behavior).

Will this campaign expose him as the imposter, and the pretender his behavior has revealed? Will it expose his hidden history and murky background. We know about his failures and mistakes.

For those who don’t, here is another in this series of revealing excerpts from HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency. The book is now available on www.amazon.com in paperback and Kindle versions. Other in e-book versions are available at www.smashwords.com.

Excerpt from the chapter: Beware the Pretender:

…”No matter how many times President Obama refers to the “problems he inherited,” he has now been in office three years. Certainly many of the current problems can be traced back to events that happened during the eight years that Bush held the top office, and some can be traced back to even earlier presidencies—but far from all of them.

Many of the problems are newly created (or made worse), and Barack Obama owns them. Candidate Obama stepped up and essentially said, “I want the job, and everything that comes with it” by running for president. After three years in office, the problems now belong to him and his presidency. He caused them, made them worse, or didn’t solve them. Either way, they are his now.

…In leadership, you cannot “pretend” to be a leader. You either are—or you aren’t—a leader. One or the other will become apparent very quickly.

If you want the leadership job, you must step up and take full ownership of it. A “pretender” or “poser” is like an actor who has learned all the right lines, but has no idea what they mean. Once the script has been followed (or deviated from), the actor is clueless about what to do next. This is the job of the leader. Unfortunately, in this government, the “directors” often seem clueless, having learned in academia where results and wins/losses are theoretical, or in politics where success (at getting elected) is more a matter of rhetoric than results.
Video 1 of 5

If you are not ready for a position, or do not believe that you have what it takes to rise to the challenge (or clean up the mess even if you believe it is not your mess), then do not take the job. This was Barack Obama’s fundamental mistake. He grossly underestimated the difficulty of the position he was running for, and overestimated his preparedness to actually do the job. Just because he could “talk a good game” (thanks to a phalanx of speech writers and the omnipresent teleprompters) does not mean he actually knew what to do or how to do it. The presidency of the United States of America is not a place for heavy OJT (On-the Job-Training)….”
BillboTex COMMENT:  I disagree with the author's opinion that Obama "...grossly underestimated the difficulty of the position ...".  I believe that EVERYTHING that Obama is doing is INTENTIONAL, no mistake, no mis-calculation, no mis-step and only looks "flawed" when you are not aware of his agenda.  If you look at any Socialist, Communist, or Marxis tactics, you will clearly see the reasons for all of his decisions.  He studied under Cloward & Piven, Derrick Bell, began his Political career in the home of  '60s radical bomber Bill Ayers, follows tactics common to Saul Alinsky, SocialistUSA Party, CommunistUSA Party's Frank Marshall Davis, .  He created 37 czars, more than any other President, who are not subject to Congressional approval, one of his czars was forced out when his communist affilliations were made public, but even more, currently remain as his czars.  Yes his intention is to CHANGE AMERICA into a European style third world style Socialist welfare state.
Video 2 of 5

After the first three plus years of the presidency, it is painfully clear that Barack Obama was a “pretty face,” and “glib speaker” and a lightweight liberal politician with a community organizer/radical background. The American people should be outraged at this man’s behavior and even his candidacy. Why are they not? Because of the misinformation delivered by sympathetic liberal/mainstream media who loves his nonsensical form of governing.
Video 3 of 5

…”Obama’s perceived preparedness for the presidency is a terrible delusion, from which it is difficult to escape. Mistakes build upon each other and result in even more complex problems. Difficult problems that are mishandled become even more difficult to fix. When you have too little experience, lack substance (other than the words of your latest speech), then leading, managing and problem solving simply don’t happen. And that is what has occurred. When you compound the problem by surrounding your self with like-minded theorists, lacking in real-world experience, things become worse yet. The theoretical solutions to problems often don’t work due to the messiness of the real world—and the reasons are almost unfathomable to these rookie executive/politicians. …”
Video 4 of 5

What should Americans think about this “imposter?” Will he divulge his true background so we can all see who he is and where he came from—really? If not, is this just a man who should never have been sworn into the office of President in the first place, and who has crippled Americans miserably during his term?

Will we continue to believe his misstatements (the politically correct term for lies)? Can he simply use the media to “erase and forget the past three years of misery and mis-steps?” Or will we learn from his imperialistic behavior and terrible results and throw him out in November?
Video 5 of 5

That is what why we wrote HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency. To learn more go to: www.hopeisnotastrategybook.com and sign up—and go to www.amazon.com and buy the book—and see for yourself! There are thirty chapters that reveal what was behind Barack Obama’s mistakes, failures and lack of leadership.

1 comments:

AnonymousMar 25, 2012 06:02 PM

why is the Forbes article being scrubbed from internet?

Reply


UPDATE: 3/27/2012    Federal Immigration and Naturalization Service Consular document  found of birth of a child in Kenya in 1961, to an American mother - The implicit evidence mounts!  NOBAMA 2012


UPDATE:  Late 3/27/2012   Hawaii records official now swears affidavit  ---------------    There IS NO OBAMA HAWAIIAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE - vote NOBAMA 2012!

SCOTUS - Kagan ObamaCare Recusal

Elena Kagan MUST recuse herself or be disqualified from the Supreme Court case regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare).

As Solicitor General, Kagan was involved in the deliberative process regarding the defense of ObamaCare. This gives her access to information that may be protected by legal privilege. This alone creates a conflict of interest, never mind the fact that she celebrated ObamaCare's passage in an email exchange, the day it passed, with a subject line “fingers and toes crossed today!” with Lawrence Tribe -- Clearly indicating that both Tribe and Kagan were discussing with great anticipation and support, the imminent passage of ObamaCare.  Tribe, is a liberal Harvard law professor, and former teacher and mentor of Obama.  Tribe was serving at that time in a specially created capacity in the Department of Justice called “Senior Counsel for Access to Justice.

Kagan e-mailed Tribe at 11:39 am “I hear they have the votes, Larry!!  Simply amazing.”  Exclamation points are hers.

Tribe replied late that afternoon “So health care is basically done!  Remarkable.   And with the Stupak group accepting the magic of what amounts to a signing statement on steroids!”  Exclamation point is his, seeming to show his glee about the fast-one they had just pulled on Stupak and other pro-life Democrats.

The Obama team managed to bury the evidence of this "smoking gun" for months.  A thorough vetting of Kagan's role in ObamaCare could have forced her to pledge to recuse herself from this case in order to get confirmed.

Kagan -- as Solicitor General -- had a rooting interest in the passage of ObamaCare.  She supported the bill and seemed joyful at the bill's passage.  And as the Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) has carefully documented, Kagan engaged her department in the strategy to defend ObamaCare in court “before [ObamaCare] had even been signed into law.”  JCN also tracks how Kagan was involved in the “deliberative process” for her office’s legal defense of ObamaCare.

It is clear that Kagan's "impartiality might REASONABLY be questioned," because of her PERSONAL investment in the deliberative process of crafting a defense for ObamaCare, and therefore, per federal law, she must be disqualified from this case.

That is how we the people are guaranteed an impartial deliberation by the Supreme Court, of the Constitutionality of the laws of our country, America.

For Judge Kagan to do otherwise, and inject her deliberations into a setting which DEMANDS her recusal, would be UNCONSCIONABLE and illegal.


UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 3/27/2012


UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 3/30/2012


UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 4/1/2012


UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 4/9/2012


UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 4/14/2012




This fax was sent to POTUS, Gov. Christie, GOP Candidates Gingrich, Romney, Santorum, Paul, Senators Issa, Cornyn, Hutchinson, Rubio, Snowe, McConnell, Reid, Feinstein, Reed, Murray, Boxer, Tester, Kyl, Representatives Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, DeMint, Poe, Rand Paul, Levin, Pelosi, New first-term House Republicans West, Berg, Noem, Crawford, Gosar, Benishek, Nunnelee, Guinta, McKinley, Griffin, Huizenga, Ellmers, Rigell, Womack, Runyan, Heck, Kelly, Herrera, Gardner, Palazzo, Nugent, Lankford, McCarthy, and various Conservative and Liberal media outlets. 

Tocqueville NAILS Obama

It is AMAZING how much French political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville knew about America from a single visit in the early 1800’s!  Here are some of his quotes:

“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.”

-- de Tocqueville Democracy In America

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”

-- de Tocqueville

“America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”

-- de Tocqueville

“There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.”

-- de Tocqueville

“Americans are so enamored of equality, they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.”

-- de Tocqueville

“Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”

-- de Tocqueville

“What good does it do me, after all, if an ever-watchful authority keeps an eye out to ensure that my pleasures will be tranquil and races ahead of me to ward off all danger, sparing me the need even to think about such things, if that authority, even as it removes the smallest thorns from my path, is also absolute master of my liberty and my life; if it monopolizes vitality and existence to such a degree that when it languishes, everything around it must also languish; when it sleeps, everything must also sleep; and when it dies, everything must also perish? ”

-- de Tocqueville

“We can state with conviction, therefore, that a man's support for absolute government is in direct proportion to the contempt he feels for his country.”

-- de Tocqueville

“No protracted war can fail to endanger the freedom of a democratic country”

-- de Tocqueville

“I have always thought that in revolutions, especially democratic revolutions, madmen, not those so called by courtesy, but genuine madmen, have played a very considerable political part. One thing is certain, and that is that a condition of semi-madness is not unbecoming at such times, and often even leads to success.”

-- de Tocqueville

Vote GOP primary winner in 2012 to RESTORE America